On 7/7/15 9:04 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Yes.
At this point I think you and I understand what we're talking about.
I haven't been involved in this doc in a while.
I think we need to let Tirumaleswar comment as well as get feedback from
the rest of the group.
The main think I have been bringing to this is a fresh perspective,
without any preconceptions about what the document is trying to say.
I agree it would benefit from further discussion among all the
contributors to the document.
Some of this may have been discussed in the WG while I was not watching,
and you and I have been intentionally abstract.
Unless you and I have both missed something obvious it seems unlikely
we'll be done with this issue by the telechat.
Yeah. That seems likely.
I am attending the Prague IETF and would be happy to spend significant
cycles that week wordsmithing/discussing this issue with PCP folks if we
don't clear before then.
I won't be in Prague. It seems I have become an emeritus participant.
But I'll be available remotely. (Though early in the day Prague time
would be tough for me.)
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
