I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-10
Some misunderstanding, I think.
Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section
2.2 of http://www.ietf.org/id-info
Hi Brian,
> However, note that an IANA Considerations section is always required, even if
> it says that no IANA action is necessary.
I removed this as per the guidance of Amanda (IANA). I am not sure it's always
required. Amanda, could you please confirm on this?
Thanks!
--
Uma C.
-Ori
That looks fine (in the -06), thanks.
However, note that an IANA Considerations section is always required, even
if it says that no IANA action is necessary.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 30/06/2015 08:38, Uma Chunduri wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thanks for your consideration and for providing the m
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your consideration and for providing the modified text quickly.
That works and it's a great help.
Shall update this in the next version.
--
Uma C.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:32 PM
To
Hi Uma,
See below...
On 30/06/2015 06:19, Uma Chunduri wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side).
> Response i-line [Uma]:
>
> --
> Uma C.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, J
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side).
Response i-line [Uma]:
--
Uma C.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:37 PM
To: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis@ietf.org; General Area Rev
Hi Tiru,
You have resolved many of my concerns.
I raised a number of questions, and in many cases you responded with an
explanation of how you intend for things to work. That is good - in most
cases the answer makes sense to me. But my point in raising the
questions was that I don't think the
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the detailed review. Please see inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 2:32 AM
> To: draft-ietf-pcp-authentication@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call re
