I am happy that doc is still useful.
Best Wishes to All here at geda,
Steve M.
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 08:44 -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Colin D Bennett wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
> > kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> I am sure this has
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Default ksymbols look like a good idea to me. So good, that I comitted
> a feature request at launchpad:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/828388
>
s/ksymbols/footprints/
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.
Stephen Ecob wrote:
> PCB doesn't "throw away" - but it doesn't have a visible placeholder
> for missing footprints.
Default ksymbols look like a good idea to me. So good, that I comitted
a feature request at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/828388
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
> But when I import a schematic into pcb it "seems" to throw away anything
> that has an unknown footprint
> Is this just the way pcb works or am I missing something
PCB doesn't "throw away" - but it doesn't have a visible placeholder
for missing footprints.
It helps to have the "Message Log" wind
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I am sure this has been done to death but I have to ask
I am a beginner and the way I am using gschem and pcb is quite awkward
I open my schematic in gschem and open pcb
Then when I
Friends -
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:43:50AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > For instance, here
> > are some footprint file names from my library:
> >
> > Abracon_ABM8G.fp
> > ADAM_TECH_2PH_2.00_mm_pin_header_SMT_2_pin.fp
> > ADAM_TECH_2PH_2.00_mm_pin_header_SMT_3_pin.
Colin D Bennett wrote:
> For instance, here
> are some footprint file names from my library:
>
> Abracon_ABM8G.fp
> ADAM_TECH_2PH_2.00_mm_pin_header_SMT_2_pin.fp
> ADAM_TECH_2PH_2.00_mm_pin_header_SMT_3_pin.fp
> ADAM_TECH_2PH_2.00_mm_pin_header_SMT_4_pin.fp
> Antenna_Inverted_F__Ember__2.4GHz__62
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
> I am a beginner and the way I am using gschem and pcb is quite awkward
> I open my schematic in gschem and open pcb
> Then when I add a component in gschem I switch to pcb to search for a
> footprint
> When I find the proper footprint in pcb I switch back to gschem a
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
> I am sure this has been done to death but I have to ask
> I am a beginner and the way I am using gschem and pcb is quite awkward
> I open my schematic in gschem and open pcb
> Then when I add a component in gschem I switch to p
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:35 AM, wrote:
> I am sure this has been done to death but I have to ask
> I am a beginner and the way I am using gschem and pcb is quite awkward
> I open my schematic in gschem and open pcb
> Then when I add a component in gschem I switch to pcb to search for a
> footpri
I am sure this has been done to death but I have to ask
I am a beginner and the way I am using gschem and pcb is quite awkward
I open my schematic in gschem and open pcb
Then when I add a component in gschem I switch to pcb to search for a footprint
When I find the proper footprint in pcb I switch
11 matches
Mail list logo
