Stefan Salewski wrote:
> In my opinion IncScape has a nice GUI,
It sure is a beautiful and very usable GUI.
Being such a high profile application, I'd expect the code up to standards.
A close look how they do things, may be useful. Besides, inkscape runs fine
on windows. So the notorious cross
Kevin Vermeer wrote:
> kaimartin, are you saying that simply swapping the positions (just the
> Y components, even) of a pin on a symbol will cause gnetlist to break?
No. I Am talking about the position in the *.sch file. Not about the
position inside the symbol.
It's a completely different sce
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tamas Szabo wrote:
> I know this sounds a silly idea, and I never found similar in any schematic
> editor, but wouldn't it be possible to move pins dynamically on the edge of
> the device in gschem as simply as moving any other attribute like refdes,
> value, etc?
"Kai-Martin Knaak" wrote:
>
> If it were me, I'd suggest even more intrusive changes. From the top
> of my head:
>
> * icon bars, that can be docked or even moved outside the main window
> * icon bars that can be user configured.
> * simple keyboard input to move and place actions
I like this.
On 08/04/2010 06:50 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Ok, I stop before I enter pipe dream mode.
Those are good ideas. Maybe he'll code two of them.
JG
or three...
PS larger icons are fine too. Configured via something like pcbmenu.res files
so we can publish many UIs, not just one. Board design
Armin Faltl wrote:
> I think your icons look nice, but as you stated, the text in them is
> superfluous and should be in tooltips.
It should be text or icons or both -- configurable by the user. Text should
be real text, not part of an image. This allows for a configurable font size
and subpixe
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 00:31 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> still offer an intuitive UI. Think Autocad Inventor, SolidWorks,
> Microstation and the like.
>
In my opinion IncScape has a nice GUI, but I have no idea how those
Icons scale with screen size...
And they have a "Lock" Icon on the sc
John Griessen wrote:
>> I agree with Andrew. We should use smaller icons, no text, with a
>> tooltip containing a description and the shortcut sequence.
>
> +1
> JG
>
I disagree.
Smaller icons than currently become a pain on large screens.
Icons should be scalable. There is a reason why desk
On 08/04/2010 01:39 PM, Patrick Doyle wrote:
(I have already verified that the vvp file thinks it's operating on a
17 bit value instead of a 16 bit value, so I've narrowed it down to
not being a VVP problem -- which seems pretty obvious, but I like to
eliminate the obvious as quickly as possible
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:42:42 +0200
Bas Gieltjes wrote:
> Use this in your gschemrc to disable the gschem toolbars:
>
> ; toolbars string
> ;
> ; Controls if the toolbars are visible or not.
> ;
> ;(toolbars "enabled")
> (toolbars "disabled")
duh. toolbar not menubar... sorry and thank you (and p
On 08/04/2010 05:54 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
c) Rearrange the order of symbols in the file with a text editor.
Downside: laborious.
I know this sounds a silly idea, and I never found similar in any
schematic editor, but wouldn't it be possible to move pins dynamically
on the edge of the de
Thanks guys. I'll dive right in and see what happens. I'll keep the
list up to date as I make some progress. (Ah the things I will do to
avoid my Thesis. :-P )
Mark
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> Is there documentation in any form as to how to go about this, or do I
>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
>
> This looks like a bug in Icarus Verilog, I'm afraid. Since all the
> values in your expression have explicit sizes, the bit width need
> not have carry space tacked on and the width should be 26bits.
> In fact, in your example the bus is
This looks like a bug in Icarus Verilog, I'm afraid. Since all the
values in your expression have explicit sizes, the bit width need
not have carry space tacked on and the width should be 26bits.
In fact, in your example the bus is particularly nasty because it
causes the enablemask bits to be shi
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Larry Doolittle
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:58:51AM -0400, Patrick Doyle wrote:
>> Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
>> feature.
>
> Verilog. Probably.
>
>> reg [5:0] offset;
>> reg [9:0] enablemask;
>> initial begin
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> Option 3.) I'd make a symbol for each function the chip supports,
> and instantiate a subset of those that I need, carefully annotating
> overlaps in pin usage, so that no pin is used twice accidentally. This
> is required work for using such a chip anyway.
Note, that
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:58:51AM -0400, Patrick Doyle wrote:
> Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
> feature.
Verilog. Probably.
> reg [5:0] offset;
> reg [9:0] enablemask;
>initial begin
> enablemask = 10'b0_00110;
> offset = 0;
>
On 4 August 2010 16:08, John Griessen wrote:
> Creating menu pulldowns for action commands isn't hard -- I've done some.
> How about you next? If you do, I'll test them in the next two weeks.
Have to read up on that. I understand what you are talking about, but
I have no idea how it is done in
On 08/04/2010 09:58 AM, Patrick Doyle wrote:
Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
feature. I would expect the two $display statements to show the same
results. For some reason, the first one expands the result to 27 bits
instead of the 26 bits I would have expe
Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
feature. I would expect the two $display statements to show the same
results. For some reason, the first one expands the result to 27 bits
instead of the 26 bits I would have expected. The only difference
(hopefully) between
Stefan,
Use this in your gschemrc to disable the gschem toolbars:
; toolbars string
;
; Controls if the toolbars are visible or not.
;
;(toolbars "enabled")
(toolbars "disabled")
Bas
--
> i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
> out how to disable the menu b
On 08/04/2010 03:29 AM, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
A first search for "rotate footprint" did not help
me out as quick as I wanted, so I went to my local pcb git repository
and updated the source to have the newest possible version and rebuilt
it. Checked the documentation and searched for "rotate"
> Tamas Szabo writes:
> I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots
> of them with multiplexed functions.
> 1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
> [snip]
> 2. I can separate pins by functions, without keeping the pins' order:
> [snip]
> Furthermore, since the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:09:49 +0200, Stefan Tauner
wrote:
> Hello
>
> i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
> out how to disable the menu bar in gschem. i mean the one with the
> icons of the most used actions like new file, load/save, undo etc.
> it was nice to h
*bump*
Can someone with push rights to gaf get Richard's gnetlist patch into
mainline?
Cheers,
Rob
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 00:22 +0100, Richard Barlow wrote:
> Hi
>
> I discovered a bug in the partslist[1-3] backend for gnetlist when
> processing hierarchical designs. It strips the refdes of sub
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:09 +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> Hello
>
> i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
> out how to disable the menu bar in gschem. i mean the one with the
> icons of the most used actions like new file, load/save, undo etc.
> it was nice to ha
Tamas Szabo writes:
> I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots
> of them with multiplexed functions.
>
> 1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
> + easily fit to the schematic, 4x16 pin
> + easy to create the symbol
> - no functional grouping
> - ha
Hello
i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
out how to disable the menu bar in gschem. i mean the one with the
icons of the most used actions like new file, load/save, undo etc.
it was nice to have the first 5 minutes, but after getting familiar
with gschem it ju
Oh I thought you were asking how to rotate.
Didn't read all email.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM, timecop wrote:
> I remember seeing http://www.delorie.com/electronics/r8c-27-adapter/ a
> while ago.
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am in the progress of
I remember seeing http://www.delorie.com/electronics/r8c-27-adapter/ a
while ago.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am in the progress of making a DIP-64 carrier pcb for a QFP64 MCU
> which also will carry voltage regulator, crystal and some glue logic.
> My first
Hi,
I am in the progress of making a DIP-64 carrier pcb for a QFP64 MCU
which also will carry voltage regulator, crystal and some glue logic.
My first attempt used a straight QFP64 package aligned 90 degrees.
When doing the routing I found that I my task would be a lot easier if
I could rotate the
31 matches
Mail list logo
