Re: [gdal-dev] CSharp bindings queued for removal (was Re: GDAL CSharp bindings maintainers/contributors listening... ?)

I think it more reflects this thread https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2021-April/053868.html On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 09:11, Rahkonen Jukka < jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > > > The named maintainer thing may reflect this thread Re: [gdal-dev] C# > bindings compilati

Re: [gdal-dev] CSharp bindings queued for removal (was Re: GDAL CSharp bindings maintainers/contributors listening... ?)

It seems to be a hyper aggressive move to go from a highly technical question about UTF-8 to "remove C# totally". If the question is "We need a named maintainer for C# or we remove it" then I will step forward since I have an app that depends on it. However, I don't feel competent enough in SWIG t

Re: [gdal-dev] CSharp bindings queued for removal (was Re: GDAL CSharp bindings maintainers/contributors listening... ?)

Hi, The named maintainer thing may reflect this thread Re: [gdal-dev] C# bindings compilation from 2021. -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Paul Harwood via gdal-dev Lähetetty: keskiviikko 29. tammikuuta 2025 10.

[gdal-dev] Approval of github requests now enabled

Hi, I've disabled the rights for contributors with github merge requests to auto-approve their own. Straight translation: "someone" from the "community" will have to approve or disapprove my pull requests, or they will sit in the limbo, as they should. Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC106: Metadata items to reflect driver update capabilities

Motion passed with +1 from PSC members JavierJS, JukkaR, SeanG and me (and community member Andrew Aitchison) Even Le 27/01/2025 à 10:24, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : Hi, The RFC text has been adjusted to reflect the candidate implementation which is now ready Motion: Adopt RFC106:

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 100: Add support for the float16 data type

Thanks Erik for finalizing all that work. +1 Even Le 07/11/2024 à 15:39, Erik Schnetter via gdal-dev a écrit : I move to adopt RFC 100 (adding support for the float16 data type). The pull request for RFC 100 is here: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10146 . A candidate implementation is h

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 100: Add support for the float16 data type

Thanks Even and Erik for the additional work on RFC 100!! Let's get the voting going again. I hereby change my vote: +1 KurtS On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:24 AM Kurt Schwehr wrote: > I vote -1 currently as there hasn't been enough discussion. I just added > comments to the RFC PR. > > On Thu, Nov

[gdal-dev] gdal2tiles error with exclude and vsigs

Hi, I'm just reporting an error with gdal2tiles when running with the --exclude argument and with the output directory being set to a google bucket using /vsigs/. It appears that the absence of a blank tile causes the upload to fail. The command works fine without --exclude. Full error below the m