I think it more reflects this thread https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2021-April/053868.html
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 09:11, Rahkonen Jukka < jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > > > The named maintainer thing may reflect this thread Re: [gdal-dev] C# > bindings compilation > <https://www.mail-archive.com/gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org/msg35936.html> > from 2021. > > > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > *Lähettäjä:* gdal-dev <gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> *Puolesta *Paul > Harwood via gdal-dev > *Lähetetty:* keskiviikko 29. tammikuuta 2025 10.14 > *Vastaanottaja:* Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> > *Kopio:* gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> > *Aihe:* Re: [gdal-dev] CSharp bindings queued for removal (was Re: GDAL > CSharp bindings maintainers/contributors listening... ?) > > > > It seems to be a hyper aggressive move to go from a highly technical > question about UTF-8 to "remove C# totally". > > > > If the question is "We need a named maintainer for C# or we remove it" > then I will step forward since I have an app that depends on it. However, I > don't feel competent enough in SWIG to address detailed changes such as > UTF-8 without help. > > > > I seem to remember saying the same thing a few years ago and did not even > get an acknowledgement that I had responded. > > > > Paul > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, 04:32 Even Rouault via gdal-dev, < > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hearing silence, the only logical conclusion is that there is no interest > ==> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11746 > > > > Le 27/09/2024 à 20:15, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : > > Hi, > > This is your regular remainder that nobody in the core GDAL maintainer > team is a CSharp aficionado (we don't have a personal grief against it, > just that we are blatantly ignorant, at least speaking for myself !), so > related tickets about it will definitely result in no action. > > See > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22csharp+bindings%22 > > The current trend is that people seem to be annoyed by UTF-8 related > issues. The issue is likely that our methods that accept or take a const > char* in the SWIG bindings should use a specific typemap to map to CSharp > Unicode strings instead of the "C" one or whatever those concepts are > called in CSharp. There is an existing "utf8_path" typemap that is used in > method that accept filenames, that should probably be renamed to > utf8_string and be used more extensively. And probably with a version of > the methods to also return a raw C string / bytearray in the cases where > drivers don't know the encoding and might return "random" stuff. Cf pull > request #10652 where I did something for Java that suffered from that later > issue. > > Happy pull requests! > > Even > > -- > > http://www.spatialys.com > > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > -- > > http://www.spatialys.com > > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > Grumpy maintainer. > > "De l'égo à l'égoût, il n'y a qu'une bouche mal refermée", André Isaac > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
