can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this? use
b.android.com (and feel free to mail me to ensure that they get
noticed).
one thing we'd like to do is get to a point where we're building
gcc/gdb et cetera without any local hacks, and when we've got to that
point, we're going to have to g
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2014, at 10:32 AM, enh wrote:
>> can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this?
>
> I suspect you meant to ask Alexander this question… but just in case you did
> intend to ask me, no. I don’t have a
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> 2014-08-15 21:32 GMT+04:00 enh :
>> can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this? use
>> b.android.com (and feel free to mail me to ensure that they get
>> noticed).
>
> Sure, I will do that.
>
&
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/12/14 03:02, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Bionic - Android libc - supports indirect functions right now, but
>> they are disabled in gcc;
>>
>> We cannot do the configure-time check for that, because there is only
>> one version
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/13/14 10:46, enh wrote:
>>
>> This feels like a bad idea to me simply because a new compiler with an
>> old runtime will generate code that fails, right?
>>
>>
>> yes, but that's already
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>>> Testing for *android* is less than ideal, because of the possibility of
>>> configuring a *-linux* toolchain to have multilibs using various different
>>> C libraries (with -m
does https://android-review.googlesource.com/103445 look okay?
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:36 AM, enh wrote:
>> you can see the current version of bionic's stdio.h here:
>>
>> https://android.googlesou
way of saying:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:09 PM, enh wrote:
>> does https://android-review.googlesource.com/103445 look okay?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 5,
