[PATCH] [x86] Incorrect naming of FMA Builtins in documentation.

2013-09-11 Thread Cameron McInally
Hey guys, It appears that there are errors in the x86 FMA Builtins documentation. The FMA instruction names should be prefixed with a 'v'. Also the FMA instructions operate on XMM/YMM registers, not MMX registers. Please find a Patch and ChangeLog attached for both issues. I do not have commit ac

[PATCH] Remove old x86 builtins from documentation

2013-06-13 Thread Cameron McInally
Hey guys, I'm a first time patch submitter, please be gentle. It probably goes without saying, but I do not have svn write access. The patch attached is related to PR38836. This patch removes the following x86 builtins from the documentation: __builtin_ia32_cmpnlts * __builtin_ia32_loadaps __bui

[PATCH] Fix documentation for x86 __builtin_ia32_cmp*s

2013-06-14 Thread Cameron McInally
Hey guys, The documentation states that the return types on the x86 __builtin_ia32_cmp*s builtins are integer vectors. This is inconsistent with the source. These builtins actually return floating point vectors. Here is a small patch to update the documentation. -Cameron Index: doc/extend.texi ==

[ping] Re: [PATCH] Remove old x86 builtins from documentation

2013-07-17 Thread Cameron McInally
Ping. I do realize that patches of this nature are of low priority, but I would really like to see it committed to save my users from tripping over the docs. Thanks again, Cameron On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Cameron McInally wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm a first time patch sub

[ping] Re: [PATCH] Fix documentation for x86 __builtin_ia32_cmp*s

2013-07-17 Thread Cameron McInally
Ping. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Cameron McInally wrote: > Hey guys, > > The documentation states that the return types on the x86 > __builtin_ia32_cmp*s builtins are integer vectors. This is > inconsistent with the source. These builtins actually return floating > point

Re: [ping] Re: [PATCH] Fix documentation for x86 __builtin_ia32_cmp*s

2013-07-25 Thread Cameron McInally
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: > 2013/7/17 Cameron McInally : >> Ping. >> >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Cameron McInally >> wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> The documentation states that the return types on the x86

Re: [ping] Re: [PATCH] Remove old x86 builtins from documentation

2013-07-25 Thread Cameron McInally
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: >> 2013/7/17 Cameron McInally : >>> Ping. >>> >>> I do realize that patches of this nature are of low priority, but I >>> would really l