ing that it may be good to add some tests to check that structs
with implicit initialization to 0s don't trigger this diagnostic.
struct ( int a; void *b; } a = { 0 };
struct ( int a; int b; void *b; } b = { 0 , 0 };
There might be other corner cases worth testing.
Thanks for adding this diagnostic! Feel free to add:
Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar
Acked-by: Alejandro Colomar
Cheers,
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
check for nonstring cases.
> * gcc.dg/Wunterminated-string-initialization-c++.c: Duplicate
> C test for -Wc++-compat.
The log and the code look good to me, but I'm not a maintainer, so can't
review that part. For the behavior and tests:
Acked-by: Alejand
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:54:52AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
> > * ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
>
> This is missing tests for th
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:54:34AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > +/* { dg-options "-Wno-declaration-after-statement -Wno-pedantic -Wno-vla"
> > } */
>
> > +/* { dg-options "-Wno-pedantic -Wvla-par
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 17:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 16:46, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > >
> > > contrib/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > &g
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 04:43:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > + if (strcmp (xstr(countof), "_Alignas") != 0)
>
> countof should definitely not expand to _Alignas!
D'oh! :-)
> I don't
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:11:18PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 12/05/25 17:53 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
> > Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
> > Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
>
> What
o that in the following days,
since I'll be traveling.
I haven't yet implemented the pedantic diagnostic for old C versions.
This is in my TODO list. I think that's the only thing I'm missing.
Have a lovely night!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (3):
contrib/: Add support for Cc: an
iewicz
Cc: Douglas McIlroy
Cc: Jason Merrill
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Cc: Patrizia Kaye
Cc: Ori Bernstein
Cc: Robert Seacord
Cc: Marek Polacek
Cc: Sam James
Cc: Richard Biener
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc | 26 +
gcc/c-fam
contrib/ChangeLog:
* gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCommit):
Add support for 'Cc: ' and 'Link: ' tags.
Cc: Jason Merrill
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
contrib/gcc-changelog/git_commit.py | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude/stdcountof.h | 31 +++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/ginclude
Hi Jakub,
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:02:17PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 09:32:50PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * Makefile.in
>
> Missing (USER_H): Add stdcountof.h.
Thanks!
> > --- /dev/null
&g
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 09:00:58PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > contrib/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCommit):
> > Add support for 'Cc: ' and 'Link: ' t
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 09:39:34PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > > contrib/ChangeLog:
> > > >
> > > > * gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCommit):
> > > > Add support for 'Cc: ' and 'Link: ' tags.
> > >
> > > Please remove this patch from this patch series; it has not
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:43:18PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 09:39:34PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > > > contrib/ChangeLog:
> > > > >
> > > > > * gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCom
Have a lovely day!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (4):
contrib/: Add support for Link: tags
c: Add _Countof operator
c: Add
c: Add -Wpedantic diagnostic for _Countof
contrib/gcc-changelog/git_commit.py| 3 +
gcc/Makefile.in| 1 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:50:23AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Fair enough, I have no objection to adding Link: support to the
> git_commit.py script. (We don't really have anybody who is the owner
> of those scripts now, so I think you need a global reviewer to approve
> it.)
Th
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:39:21AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 23:15, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by>
> >
> >
Hi Jason,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:35:00AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > It seems to be one of the more common trailers used in the linux
> > > kernel [1],
>
> Hmm, I don't see it in that list. But it is described in
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
It was mentio
/questions/37538/#57537491>
Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc | 26 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.def | 3 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.h
contrib/ChangeLog:
* gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCommit):
Add support for 'Link:' tags.
Cc: Jason Merrill
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
contrib/gcc-changelog/git_commit.py | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/gcc-changelog/git_co
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude/stdcountof.h | 31 +++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
It is not supported in <= C23 mode.
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
* c-parser.cc (c_parser_sizeof_or_countof_expression):
Add -Wpedantic diagnostic for _Countof in <= C23 mode.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c/c-parser.cc | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git
contrib/ChangeLog:
* gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCommit):
Add support for 'Link:' tags.
Cc: Jason Merrill
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
Hi,
This patch is needed by my patches that add _Countof.
Have a lovely day!
Alex
contrib/gcc-changelog/git_com
/questions/37538/#57537491>
Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc | 26 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.def | 3 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.h
hey look good.
Have a lovely day!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (3):
c: Add _Countof operator
c: Add
c: Add -Wpedantic diagnostic for _Countof
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc | 26 +++
gcc/c-family/c-common.def
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/countof-stdcountof.c: Add tests for .
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude
.dg/countof-pedantic.c
* gcc.dg/countof-pedantic-errors.c:
Test pedantic diagnostics for _Countof.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c/c-parser.cc | 4
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-compat.c | 8
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 05:01:36PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, I've been trying to find a compromise between readability and
> > simplicity, and I think I have something. I've seen some
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:25:39PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > - Add (and NDEBUG) to some test files that were missing it,
> >and also the forward declaration of strcmp(3).
>
> Depending on libc heade
Hi Joseph,
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 02:43:55PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Could you please clarify if I need to do anything or if this is already
> > scheduled for review when you have some time? Also please clarify if
> > you're okay with amending that or if you prefer that I send v23.
>
> I
f.
Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc| 26
gcc/c-family/c-common.def | 3 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.h
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:20:27PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:12:38PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Okay; how about this?
> >
> > gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * c-common.h: Add _Countof operato
I've
only ran `make check -j24` once at the tip, and all the countof tests
pass.
Have a lovely night!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (3):
c: Add _Countof operator
c: Add
c: Add -Wpedantic diagnostic for _Countof
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/c-family/c-common
tic-errors on C23.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c/c-parser.cc | 4
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-compat.c | 8
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-no-compat.c | 5 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-pedantic-errors.c | 8
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/countof-stdcountof.c: Add tests for .
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 07:13:15PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 05:01:36PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmm, I've been trying to find a compromise between readabilit
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:25:29PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:15:33PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > I've based on gnulib commits, which I believe follow the same
> > guidelines. For example:
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 02:17:58AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here's another revision of this patch set.
>
> v23 changes:
>
> - More specific change logs.
> - #define assert() instead of #include'ing .
>
> `make check` says all'
PR c/117025
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/countof-vla.c: Remove spurious comments.
* gcc.dg/countof-zero-compile.c: Remove spurious comments.
Fixes: 517c9487f8fd (2025-05-27; "c: Add _Countof operator [PR117025]")
Reported-by: Sam James
Signed-off-by:
Hi Jakub, Joseph,
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 08:22:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Thanks, I've committed these patches, with additional commit message
> > changes to reference PR117025 in the standard way for GCC so that Bugzilla
it,
and also the forward declaration of strcmp(3).
- Fix typos in dejagnu diagnostic comments.
Is this ready to merge now, hopefully? :-)
Have a lovely night!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (3):
c: Add _Countof operator
c: Add
c: Add -Wpedantic diagnostic for _Count
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/countof-stdcountof.c: Add tests for .
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude
.dg/countof-pedantic.c
* gcc.dg/countof-pedantic-errors.c:
Test pedantic diagnostics for _Countof.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c/c-parser.cc | 4
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-compat.c | 8
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof
* gcc.dg/countof-zero-compile.c
* gcc.dg/countof-zero.c
* gcc.dg/countof.c: Add tests for _Countof operator.
Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.c
Here's the test run. No regressions.
BTW, there are some differences between runs. I _think_ this is due to
running them in separate days, and having run 'make install' in between,
which seems to have made some tests that would normally fail now succeed
but that's unrelated to the feature, and i
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:12:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > * c-common.h: Add RID_COUNTOF.
>
> (enum rid): Add RID_COUNTOF.
Okay.
>
> > (c_countof_type): New function prototype.
> > * c-common.def (COUNTOF_EXPR): New tree.
> > * c-common.cc
> > (c_common_re
ave a lovely night!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (3):
c: Add _Countof operator
c: Add
c: Add -Wpedantic diagnostic for _Countof
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc | 26
gcc/c-family/c-common.def | 3 +
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: New file.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/countof-stdcountof.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude/stdcountof.h
est.
* gcc.dg/countof-pedantic.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/countof-pedantic-errors.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c/c-parser.cc | 4
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-compat.c | 8
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-no-compa
* gcc.dg/countof-zero.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/countof.c: New test.
Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc| 26
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:12:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > warning_at (loc, OPT_Wc___compat,
> > "defining type in %qs expression is invalid in C++",
> > (in_sizeof
> > ? "sizeof"
> > -: (in_typeof ? "typeof" : "alignof")));
>
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:36:56PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:12:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > warning_at (loc, OPT_Wc___compat,
> > > "defining type in %qs expression is invalid in
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:31:05PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > +#define c_parser_sizeof_expressi
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:47:30PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > @@ -1747,6 +1737,8 @@ static struct c_expr c_parser_binary_expression
> > (c_parser *, struct c_expr *,
> > tree);
> > static struct c_expr c_parser_cast_expr
f.
Suggested-by: Xavier Del Campo Romero
Co-authored-by: Martin Uecker
Acked-by: "James K. Lowden"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c-family/c-common.cc| 26
gcc/c-family/c-common.def | 3 +
gcc/c-family/c-common.h
tic-errors on C23.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/c/c-parser.cc | 4
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-compat.c | 8
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-no-compat.c | 5 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/countof-pedantic-errors.c | 8
(test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/countof-zero.c (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/countof-zero.c execution test
PASS: gcc.dg/countof.c (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/countof.c execution test
Have a lovely day!
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (3):
c: Add _Co
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (USER_H): Add .
* ginclude/stdcountof.h: Add countof macro.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/countof-stdcountof.c: Add tests for .
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 1 +
gcc/ginclude
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 04:26:46PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > @@ -10572,6 +10583,8 @@ c_parser_unary_expression (c_parser *parser)
> > case CPP_KEYWORD:
> >switch (c_parser_peek
ly
Cc: Mark Wielaard
Cc: Martin Uecker
Cc: Michael Kerrisk
Cc: Paul Eggert
Cc: Sam James
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar
Cc: Yann Droneaud
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
This is a resend of the same patch previously sent to gcc@.
gcc/c-family/c.opt | 4 ++--
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 2 +-
2 f
Ping
On 2/18/23 00:05, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Link:
> <https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/3098fd18-9dbf-b4e9-bae5-62ec6fea7...@opteya.com/T/>
> Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/649#discussion_r1108350066>
> Cc: Andreas Schwab
> Cc: David Malcolm
Hi Richard,
On 3/15/23 15:52, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 3:30 PM Alejandro Colomar via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Ping
>
> -Wuse-after-free=3 was explicitly added to cover cases with a high
> false-positive rate. If you want to
> make that
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/unsigned-__int128.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/unsigned-__int128.3
diff --git a/man3/unsigned-__int128.3 b/man3/unsigned-__int128.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/unsigned
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/__int128.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/__int128.3
diff --git a/man3/__int128.3 b/man3/__int128.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/__int128.3
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.so man7
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man7/system_data_types.7 | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7
index 5f9aa648f..3cf3f0ec9 100644
--- a/man7/system_data_types.7
+++ b/man7/system_data_types
Hi Michael,
I think this might be ready for a patch.
I'm done for today :-)
Cheers,
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (4):
system_data_types.7: Add '__int128'
__int128.3: New link to system_data_types(7)
system_data_types.7: Add 'unsigned __int128'
unsigne
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man7/system_data_types.7 | 40
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7
index e545aa1a0..5f9aa648f 100644
--- a/man7/system_data_types.7
+++ b/man7
Reported-by: Paul Eggert
Reported-by: David Laight
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
Paul and David,
Thanks for your input!
Alex
man7/system_data_types.7 | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7
index
Hi Michael,
The 2/2 is a typo. This is a standalone patch.
Cheers,
Alex
On 2020-10-02 11:44, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Reported-by: Paul Eggert
Reported-by: David Laight
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
Paul and David,
Thanks for your input!
Alex
man7/system_data_types.7 | 11
Reported-by: Paul Eggert
Reported-by: David Laight
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
Paul and David,
Thanks for your input!
Alex
man7/system_data_types.7 | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7
index 6451782db
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
system_data_types.7: void *: Add info about generic function parameters and
return value
Reported-by: Paul Eggert
Reported-by: David Laight
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
system_data_types.7: void *: Add info about pointer artihmetic
Reported-by: Paul
Hi Michael,
As you asked, I squashed.
And added the POSIX.1-2008 note too. Thanks for that!
Cheers,
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (2):
system_data_types.7: Add 'void *'
void.3: New link to system_data_types(7)
man3/void.3 | 1 +
man7/system_data_ty
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/void.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/void.3
diff --git a/man3/void.3 b/man3/void.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/void.3
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.so man7/system_data_types.7
--
2.28.0
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man7/system_data_types.7 | 40
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7
index e545aa1a0..5f9aa648f 100644
--- a/man7/system_data_types.7
+++ b/man7
Hi Michael,
I fixed the stray '"' noticed by Florian.
Cheers,
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (4):
system_data_types.7: Add '__int128'
__int128.3: New link to system_data_types(7)
system_data_types.7: Add 'unsigned __int128'
unsigned-__int128.3: New
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/unsigned-__int128.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/unsigned-__int128.3
diff --git a/man3/unsigned-__int128.3 b/man3/unsigned-__int128.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/unsigned
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/__int128.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/__int128.3
diff --git a/man3/__int128.3 b/man3/__int128.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/__int128.3
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.so man7
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man7/system_data_types.7 | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7
index 5f9aa648f..3cf3f0ec9 100644
--- a/man7/system_data_types.7
+++ b/man7/system_data_types
so, so let's call it v4).
Regards,
Alex
Alejandro Colomar (2):
system_data_types.7: Add 'void *'
void.3: New link to system_data_types(7)
man3/void.3 | 1 +
man7/system_data_types.7 | 80 +++-
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+),
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
system_data_types.7: void *: Add info about generic function parameters and
return value
Reported-by: Paul Eggert
Reported-by: David Laight
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
system_data_types.7: void *: Add info about pointer artihmetic
Reported-by: Paul
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/void.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/void.3
diff --git a/man3/void.3 b/man3/void.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/void.3
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.so man7/system_data_types.7
--
2.28.0
Hi Paul,
On 2020-10-02 18:53, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/2/20 8:14 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
>> +.I void *
>
> GNU style is a space between "void" and "*", so this should be '.I
> "void\ *"', both here and elsewhere. The backsla
Hi Paul,
On 2020-10-02 19:52, Paul Eggert wrote:
Why describe __int128_t in these man pages at all? __int128_t is not a
property of either the kernel or of glibc, so it's out of scope.
Well, as I see it, [unsigned] __int128 is as good as [u]int64_t.
They are part of the C interface in Linux.
A
: malloc(3), memcmp(3), memcpy(3), memset(3)
See also the intptr_t and uintptr_t types in this page.
]]
Alejandro Colomar (2):
system_data_types.7: Add 'void *'
void.3: New link to system_data_types(7)
man3/void.3 | 1 +
man7/syst
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man3/void.3 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 man3/void.3
diff --git a/man3/void.3 b/man3/void.3
new file mode 100644
index 0..db50c0f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man3/void.3
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.so man7/system_data_types.7
--
2.28.0
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
system_data_types.7: void *: Add info about generic function parameters and
return value
Reported-by: Paul Eggert
Reported-by: David Laight
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
system_data_types.7: void *: Add info about pointer artihmetic
Reported-by: Paul
Hi Paul,
On 2020-10-02 21:54, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/2/20 12:01 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> If you propose not to document the stdint types either,
>
> This is not a stdint.h issue. __int128 is not in stdint.h and is not a
> system data type in any real sense; it&#
Hi Paul,
On 2020-10-02 22:14, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/2/20 11:38 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
>> .I void *
>>
>> renders with a space in between.
>
> That's odd, as "man(7)" says "All of the arguments will be printed next
> to each ot
Hi Paul,
On 2020-10-02 22:19, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/2/20 1:03 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> I know it's not in stdint,
>> but I mean that it behaves as any other stdint type.
With caveats, of course.
>
> It doesn't. There's no portable way to use sc
Hi Michael and Branden,
On 2020-10-03 09:48, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
At 2020-10-03T09:10:14+0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
On 10/2/20 10:27 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
On 2020-10-02 22:14, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/2/20 11:38 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
>
On 10/3/20 9:48 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
>> The "short" answer[1] is that I think Alex is correct; Paul's caution is
>> unwarranted and arises from confusion with the font alternation macros
>> of the man(7) macro package. Examples of the latter are .BI and .BR.
>> Those set their ev
wc -l;
Link:
<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/20210423230609.13519-1-alx.manpa...@gmail.com/T/>
Link: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YZvIlz7J6vOEY+Xu@yuki/T/>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
Nacked-by: Alexei Starovoitov
Nacked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Nacked-by: Daniel Borkmann
Acked-by:
Alexei,
On 8/24/22 20:55, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Link:
<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/20210423230609.13519-1-alx.manpa...@gmail.com/T/>
> Link: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YZvIlz7J6vOEY+Xu@yuki/T/>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
> Nacked-by: Alexei
Hi Linux,
On 8/25/22 02:52, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:36 PM Alejandro Colomar
wrote:
I'm trying to be nice, and ask for review to make sure I'm not making
some big mistake by accident, and I get disrespect? No thanks.
You've been told multiple times
Hi Greg,
On 8/25/22 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 01:36:10AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
But from your side what do we have? Just direct NAKs without much
explanation. The only one who gave some explanation was Greg, and he
vaguely pointed to Linus's com
Hi Xi,
On 8/25/22 09:28, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 09:20 +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc-patches
wrote:
I don't know for sure, and I never pretended to say otherwise. But what
IMHO the kernel could do is to make the types compatible, by typedefing
to the same fundamental
Hi Linus,
(Oops, I mistyped you name in my previous reply; I'm on a roll for funny
typos this week it seems)
On 8/25/22 09:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:20 AM Alejandro Colomar
wrote:
This patch is not about kernel, but about the section 2 and 3 manual
pages,
On 8/25/22 09:44, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 8/25/22 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 01:36:10AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
But from your side what do we have? Just direct NAKs without much
explanation. The only one who gave some explanation was Greg
Hello Daniel,
On 5/17/21 8:56 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 5/16/21 11:16 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
Discussion:
<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/6740a229-842e-b368-86eb-defc786b3...@gmail.com/T/>
Nacked-by: Alexei Starovoitov
Nac
201 - 300 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
