On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 09:25 -0400, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> Hello-
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423
>
> The diagnostics we issue while lexing tokens from a _Pragma string
> have
> always come out at invalid locations. I had tried a couple years ago
> to
> fix this in a general
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jennifer Schmitz writes:
> > [...]
> > Looking at the diff of the vect dumps (below is a section of the diff for
> > strided_store_2.c), it seemed odd that vec_to_scalar operations cost 0 now,
> > instead of the previous cost of 2:
> >
> > +stride
This patch add auto-vect patterns for vector-bfloat16 extension.
Similar to vector extensions, these patterns can use vector
BF16 instructions to optimize the automatic vectorization of for loops.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/autovec-opt.md (*widen_bf16_fma):
Add vfwmacc auto-vect
A common idiom in intrinsics loops is to have accumulator intrinsics
in an unrolled loop with an accumulator initialized to zero at the beginning.
Propagating the initial zero accumulator into the first iteration
of the loop and simplifying the first accumulate instruction is a
desirable transforma
Pushed below patch as obivous to trunk.
--
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/acle/cde-mve-error-1.c: Corrected quotation in
expected error message.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/acle/cde-mve-error-1.c | 56 +--
1 file chang
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 20:30, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2024 14:26, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is v2 of the patch series I sent in
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/657065.html.
> >
> > I have taken into account the feedback I received, and
> On 17 Oct 2024, at 22:32, Victor Do Nascimento
> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I definitely agree about the spuriousness of the V2DI mode check.
> While I can't approve, I can confirm it looks good.
Thanks for looking at it Victor.
The patch is ok.
Kyrill
>
> Thanks,
> Victor.
>
> On 10/17/24 16:10,
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 08:02:05PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 05:21:39PM GMT, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > The old name was misleading.
> > >
> > > While at it, also rename some temporary v
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 6:05 PM
> To: Jennifer Schmitz
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov ; Tamar
> Christina
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] SVE intrinsics: Add fold_active_lanes_to method to
> refactor
> svmul and svdiv.
>
>
Simon Martin writes:
> Hi Sam,
Hi Simon,
>
> On 16 Oct 2024, at 22:06, Sam James wrote:
>
>> Simon Martin writes:
>>
>>> We ICE upon the following invalid code because we end up calling
>>> finalize_nrv_r with a RETURN_EXPR with no operand.
>>>
>>> === cut here ===
>>> struct X {
>>> ~X();
>
On 16/10/24 21:39 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+
+ // True if we can unwrap _Iter to get a pointer by using std::__niter_base.
+ template
+struct __unwrappable_niter
+{
+ template struct __is_ptr { enum { __valu
On 18/10/24 10:41 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/10/24 21:39 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+
+ // True if we can unwrap _Iter to get a pointer by using std::__niter_base.
+ template
+struct __unwrappable_niter
+
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christoph Müllner
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 3:57 PM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Philipp Tomsich ;
> > Tamar
> > Christina ; Richard Biener
> > Cc: Jeff Law ; Robin Dapp ;
> > C
Could you add run test case (verified by QEMU or SPIKE ) ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Feng Wang
Date: 2024-10-18 15:24
To: gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; juzhe.zhong; Feng Wang
Subject: [PATCH v2] RISC-V:Auto vect for vector-bfloat16
This patch add auto-vect patterns for vector-bfloat16 extension
Hi All,
When finding the gsi to use for code of the root statements we should use the
one of the original statement rather than the gcond which may be inside a
pattern.
Without this the emitted instructions may be discarded later.
Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi All,
>
> When finding the gsi to use for code of the root statements we should use the
> one of the original statement rather than the gcond which may be inside a
> pattern.
>
> Without this the emitted instructions may be discarded later.
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested o
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When finding the gsi to use for code of the root statements we should use the
> one of the original statement rather than the gcond which may be inside a
> pattern.
>
> Without this the emitted instructions may be discarded later.
>
> Bo
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 11:03 AM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: Christoph Müllner ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> Philipp Tomsich ; Jeff Law ;
> Robin Dapp
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Add a new permute optimization step in SLP
>
> On Thu, 17
The assert in SLP discovery when we handle masked operations is
confusingly wide - all gather variants should be catched by
the earlier STMT_VINFO_GATHER_SCATTER_P.
Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
* tree-vect-slp.cc (vect_build_slp_tree_2): Only expect
I
Of course I forgot to actually attach the patch, now attached :)
On 18/10/2024 11:09, Alex Coplan wrote:
> Pushed to trunk.
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> * MAINTAINERS (CPU Port Maintainers): Add myself as aarch64 ldp/stp
> maintainer.
> (Various Maintainers): Add myself as pair fusion ma
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 14 2024, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have received an email from the Linaro infrastructure that the test
> gcc.dg/lto/pr115815_0.c which I added is failing on arm-eabi and I
> realized that not only it is missing dg-require-effective-target
> global_constructor but actually an
Pushed to trunk.
ChangeLog:
* MAINTAINERS (CPU Port Maintainers): Add myself as aarch64 ldp/stp
maintainer.
(Various Maintainers): Add myself as pair fusion maintainer.
Sent a new version for this in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/665794.html.
Thanks,
Konstantinos.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 4:32 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Manolis Tsamis writes:
> >> > I could have some help with that, because after the new changes a
> >> > subreg rel
From: kelefth
This pass detects cases of expensive store forwarding and tries to avoid them
by reordering the stores and using suitable bit insertion sequences.
For example it can transform this:
strbw2, [x1, 1]
ldr x0, [x1] # Expensive store forwarding to larger load.
To
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 11:03 AM
> > To: Tamar Christina
> > Cc: Christoph Müllner ;
> > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> > Philipp Tomsich ; Jeff Law
> > ;
> > Robin Dapp
> > Subject: RE:
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
