On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 13:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> On 2/9/19 7:21 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> > On 2/9/19 7:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 06:11:00PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >>> --- libphobos/libdruntime/Makefile.am (revision 268614)
> >>> +++ libphobos/
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 23:28, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> As mentioned in passing in PR d/87864, libgphobos.so currently fails to
> link before Solaris 11.4. Until then, you needed to link with -lsocket
> -lnsl for the networking functions, in S11.4 they were merged into libc.
>
> To fix this, I've ad
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 13:35, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> With the set of libphobos Solaris patches just posted, it would become
> possible to enable libphobos on Solaris 11/x86 by default.
>
> This is what this patch does.
>
> * It uses a LIBPHOBOS_SUPPORTED variable both in toplevel configure and
>
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, we've regressed on the trunk in diagnostics of some
invalid constexpr evaluations. The problem is that the constexpr evaluation
is effectively done on post-cp_fold_function bodies/arguments and cp_fold
optimizes away some important trees for constexpr diagnostics, eith
The issue in the PR is caused during simplification in the frontend
because it does not properly differentiate between expressions of
size 0 (e.g. arrays of length 0 or character strings of len=0)
and failure.
The attached patch tries to solve this problem by modifying the
helper functions gfc_ele
Hi Jakub,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:12:34AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Both the C and C++ standard guarantee that the argc argument to main is
> non-negative, the following patch sets (or adjusts) the corresponding
> SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO.
I think this should test for flag_hosted somehow? And
Hi!
On the following testcase we ICE because name is BIT_NOT_EXPR and
suggest_alternative_in_scoped_enum assumes it is called on IDENTIFIER_NODE
only.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
trunk?
There is another issue, starting with 7.x we don't use sensibl
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:47:57PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:12:34AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Both the C and C++ standard guarantee that the argc argument to main is
> > non-negative, the following patch sets (or adjusts) the corresponding
> > SSA_NAME_RAN
Hi!
The if (TYPE_REF_IS_RVALUE (type)) code has been added recently,
but build_target_expr_with_type asserts that the expression doesn't have
void type. Fixed by using the old handling in that case (the expression is
not lvalue in that case and diagnostics is emitted if complain).
Bootstrapped/r
Hi!
On the following testcase, id_expr is false and TREE_CODE (*iter)
is USING_DECL (and the following one is FUNCTION_DECL).
Since the USING_DECL changes, this ICEs because
DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P uses TREE_TYPE which can't be used here.
Previously, I believe DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTI
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:55:56PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:47:57PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:12:34AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Both the C and C++ standard guarantee that the argc argument to main is
> > > non-negative, t
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 15:44, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> Yet another trivial fix for a Solaris libphobos testsuite failure:
>
> FAIL: libphobos.shared/load.d -shared-libphobos -ldl (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libphobos/testsuite/libphobos.shared/load.d:9:
>
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Both the C and C++ standard guarantee that the argc argument to main is
> non-negative, the following patch sets (or adjusts) the corresponding
> SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO. While main is just one, with IPA VRP it can also
> propagate etc. I had to c
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 11:01, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>
> Adds a configure test for qsort_r and use the fallback code path if
> it's not available. Fixes d/88127. rt/qsort.d changes have been
> pushed upstream and reviewed there:
> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2480
> Bootstrapped & ran D te
On 2/18/19 12:14 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 18/02/19 19:28, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/18/19 5:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 18/02/19 10:20, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/17/19 6:58 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
here, when we don't see an initializer we believe we are surel
On 2/18/19 12:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On the following testcase we ICE because name is BIT_NOT_EXPR and
suggest_alternative_in_scoped_enum assumes it is called on IDENTIFIER_NODE
only.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
trunk?
OK.
There is an
On 2/18/19 12:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The if (TYPE_REF_IS_RVALUE (type)) code has been added recently,
but build_target_expr_with_type asserts that the expression doesn't have
void type. Fixed by using the old handling in that case (the expression is
not lvalue in that case and diagnost
On 2/18/19 1:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On the following testcase, id_expr is false and TREE_CODE (*iter)
is USING_DECL (and the following one is FUNCTION_DECL).
Since the USING_DECL changes, this ICEs because
DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P uses TREE_TYPE which can't be used here.
Previou
On 2/17/19 3:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:51:33AM -1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
The likely case is still that nothing has changed in between, so this patch
just quickly verifies if that is the case (by comparing
CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (ctor, 0) with the previously saved value of
Hi,
On 19/02/19 00:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/18/19 12:14 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 18/02/19 19:28, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/18/19 5:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 18/02/19 10:20, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/17/19 6:58 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
here, when we do
On 2/18/19 3:15 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 19/02/19 00:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/18/19 12:14 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 18/02/19 19:28, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/18/19 5:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 18/02/19 10:20, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/17/19 6:58 AM, P
On 2/18/19 12:45 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, we've regressed on the trunk in diagnostics of some
invalid constexpr evaluations. The problem is that the constexpr evaluation
is effectively done on post-cp_fold_function bodies/arguments and cp_fold
optimizes away some imp
Please let me know what it will take to get the fix for these two
issues approved. I've answered the questions so I don't know what
else I'm expected to do here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00793.html
On 2/11/19 12:20 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
This is a repost of a patch for
On 18/02/19 21:22 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:15:39PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
2019-02-15 Rainer Orth
* g++.dg/torture/pr89303.C (bad_weak_ptr): Rename to
bad_weak_ptr_.
Ok, thanks.
If needed, guess we could rename much more (or rename the namesp
On 08/02/19 12:56 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 07/02/19 23:35 -0500, Tom Honermann wrote:
On 2/7/19 4:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/12/18 21:27 -0500, Tom Honermann wrote:
Attached is a revised patch that addresses changes in P0482R6.
Changes from the prior patch include:
- Updated
On 07/02/19 23:39 -0500, Tom Honermann wrote:
On 2/7/19 4:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/12/18 21:27 -0500, Tom Honermann wrote:
Attached is a revised patch that addresses changes in P0482R6.
Changes from the prior patch include:
- Updated the value of the __cpp_char8_t feature test macr
On 2019-02-15 6:35 a.m., Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Hi Vlad,
On 13/02/2019 16:46, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 2019-02-13 5:54 a.m., Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
PING.
Since Jeff is away can another maintainer have a look at this please?
I see the following patch
Yeah I uploaded the wro
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:04:15PM -1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/constexpr.c.jj 2019-02-17 17:09:47.113351897 +0100
> > +++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c 2019-02-18 19:34:57.995136395 +0100
> > @@ -1269,6 +1301,49 @@ cxx_eval_builtin_function_call (const co
> > return t;
> >
From: Xiong Hu Luo
This is a backport of r25, r257253 and r258137 of trunk to gcc-7-branch.
The patches were on trunk before GCC 8 forked already. Totally 5 files need
mannual resolve due to code changes for r25. r257253 and r258137 are
dependent testcases require vsx support need merge t
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
