On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> thanks for the review.
>
> On 08/25/2011 12:45 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Tom de Vries
>> wrote:
>>> Jakub,
>>>
>>> This patch fixes a segmentation violation, which occurs when printing a
Hi Richard,
thanks for the review.
On 08/25/2011 12:45 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Jakub,
>>
>> This patch fixes a segmentation violation, which occurs when printing a
>> MEM_REF
>> or COMPONENT_REF containing a released ssa name. This
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Jakub,
>
> This patch fixes a segmentation violation, which occurs when printing a
> MEM_REF
> or COMPONENT_REF containing a released ssa name. This can happen when we
> print
> basic blocks upon removal, enabled by -ftree-dump-tree-*-deta
Jakub,
This patch fixes a segmentation violation, which occurs when printing a MEM_REF
or COMPONENT_REF containing a released ssa name. This can happen when we print
basic blocks upon removal, enabled by -ftree-dump-tree-*-details (see
remove_bb:tree-cfg.c).
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64
