On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Tom de Vries <vr...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > Jakub, > > This patch fixes a segmentation violation, which occurs when printing a > MEM_REF > or COMPONENT_REF containing a released ssa name. This can happen when we > print > basic blocks upon removal, enabled by -ftree-dump-tree-*-details (see > remove_bb:tree-cfg.c).
Where do we dump stmts there? > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. > > OK for trunk? At least TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 1)) != NULL_TREE is always true. The comment before the new lines is now in the wrong place and this check at least needs a comment as well. But - it's broken to dump freed stuff, why and where do we do this? Richard. > Thanks, > - Tom > > 2011-08-25 Tom de Vries <t...@codesourcery.com> > > * tree-pretty-print (dump_generic_node): Test for NULL_TREE before > accessing TREE_TYPE. >
