Re: change_address in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner

2013-04-24 Thread David Edelsohn
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Alan Modra wrote: > This one is in response to a comment made by Ulrich Weigand. Refer > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01804.html for why > replace_equiv_address_nv is better than change_address in this reload > related function. Bootstrapped etc.

change_address in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner

2013-04-24 Thread Alan Modra
This one is in response to a comment made by Ulrich Weigand. Refer http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01804.html for why replace_equiv_address_nv is better than change_address in this reload related function. Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64-linux. * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_s