On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > This one is in response to a comment made by Ulrich Weigand. Refer > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01804.html for why > replace_equiv_address_nv is better than change_address in this reload > related function. Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64-linux. > > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_secondary_reload_inner): Use > replace_equiv_address_nv.
This is okay, although probably is not important after LRA replacement. Thanks, David
