Paolo,
> On 06/27/2011 01:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
>>
>> This needs the mudflap maintainer.
>
> Build changes are okay, the rest is pretty obvious.
>
> For pass-stratcli
On 06/27/2011 01:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
This needs the mudflap maintainer.
Build changes are okay, the rest is pretty obvious.
For pass-stratcliff I'd rather use aut
> >>[ada, build] Link gnattools with $(LIBINTL)
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01443.html
> >>
> >>
> >> This needs a build and/or Ada maintainer. I guess this is obvious,
> >> though.
> >
> > Can you clarify how LIBINTL is set, and to what value? Will it b
Arnaud,
>> [ada, build] Link gnattools with $(LIBINTL)
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01443.html
>>
>> This needs a build and/or Ada maintainer. I guess this is obvious,
>> though.
>
> Can you clarify how LIBINTL is set, and to what value? Will it be empty
> when no
> [ada, build] Link gnattools with $(LIBINTL)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01443.html
>
> This needs a build and/or Ada maintainer. I guess this is obvious,
> though.
Can you clarify how LIBINTL is set, and to what value? Will it be empty
when not needed?
Arno
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2011, at 12:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
>>
>> [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
> As far as Da
Hi Iain,
>> The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
>>
>> [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
>>
>> This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer, though a global
>> reviewer might be helpfu
Hi Frank,
> Sure. Transcribing:
>
>> One generic issue came up with the port: enabling or disabling
>> libmudflap depends on a factor (linker support for --wrap/-z wrap)
>> that is best checked dynamically, thus doesn't really seem to belong
>> at the toplevel. Is there any precedent for perform
Hi Frank,
>> Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
>
> Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
I've installed the patch as it, since it at least fixes the libmudflap
build on Solaris.
Thanks.
Hi Rainer,
On 27 Jun 2011, at 12:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer, though
Hi -
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
> > Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
>
> Could you also comment on the open questions in the submission so
> mudflap support on Solaris can be improved further?
Sure. Transcribing:
> One generic is
Hi Frank,
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:32:30PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> [...]
>> Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
>
> Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
Could you also comment on th
Hi -
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:32:30PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> [...]
> Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
- FChE
The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer, though a global
reviewer might be helpful. I'm not Cc'ing the va
14 matches
Mail list logo