Hi - > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html > > Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area. > > Could you also comment on the open questions in the submission so > mudflap support on Solaris can be improved further?
Sure. Transcribing: > One generic issue came up with the port: enabling or disabling > libmudflap depends on a factor (linker support for --wrap/-z wrap) > that is best checked dynamically, thus doesn't really seem to belong > at the toplevel. Is there any precedent for performing such a test > in the target library and enabling or disabling depending on the > outcome? [...] I don't know. > It seems the failures fall into only a few categories. It's > probably best to analyse and fix those before checking in the patch. > Where should we continue discussing the failures? Here or rather in > the PR? Separate PRs would be best. - FChE
