Hello,
since you touch the SPE area would you mind looking at this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47856
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : seba
On May 16, 2012, at 03:10 , David Edelsohn wrote:
> Okay.
revision 187581. Thanks!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> config/rs6000:
>
> * rs6000-opts.h (enum processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_PPC8548.
> * rs6000-cpus.def: Reference it for cpu="8548".
> * rs6000.md (cpu attribute definition): Add ppc8548.
> * 8540.md: indic
Hello David,
Back on this one after Alan's correction and extra testing of the
patch on my side.
On May 7, 2012, at 18:59 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html
>
> Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the
> type of cl
On May 7, 2012, at 21:27 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Of course. That was actually my point in offering
> to open a PR, so that Alan (who did the nice recent
> reorg) can take it from there. He will certainly be
> more efficient than me in resolving this :)
PR 53271
On May 7, 2012, at 20:31 , David Edelsohn wrote:
> You can open a PR, but I assume that you mean fixing the problem
> before the patch is committed.
Yes, that was the intent.
> I would like to give Alan a chance to
> comment and look into it.
Of course. That was actually my point in offering
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 18:59 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the
>> type of cleanup I envisioned.
>
> Great :)
>
>> Thanks, David
>
> Do you want a PR for the fallout ? It is not
On May 7, 2012, at 18:59 , David Edelsohn wrote:
> Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the
> type of cleanup I envisioned.
Great :)
> Thanks, David
Do you want a PR for the fallout ? It is not related to this patch
at all. I can look into it further and make su
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>
>> Joseph and David suggested to address this in a more general fashion,
>> along lines proposed in
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html
>>
>> The attached patch is a f
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Joseph and David suggested to address this in a more general fashion,
> along lines proposed in
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html
>
> The attached patch is a first shot in this direction. Only lightly tested
> at this point
On May 7, 2012, at 15:57 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
> My first attempt at building there failed, with
>
> --target=powerpc-eabispe --with-cpu=8548 --enable-languages=c
> --disable-libada
>
> (internal compiler error on unwind-dw2.c) This failure reproduces with
> an unpatched tree as well, so
11 matches
Mail list logo
