On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2012, Olivier Hainque wrote: > >> Joseph and David suggested to address this in a more general fashion, >> along lines proposed in >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html >> >> The attached patch is a first shot in this direction. Only lightly tested >> at this point, posted to get a first round of comments to validate that this >> corresponds to what was suggested. > > I haven't checked the details of the patch, but it does look substantially > along the lines of what I think the logic should be.
Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the type of cleanup I envisioned. Thanks, David
