On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
> On 08/30/11 15:52:12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Please send a patch. [... on points 1, 2, and 3]0
>
> OK, will do.
>
> > GF: Also, the use of fixed masks is problematic. Perhaps the AWK script
> > GF: could be changed to also generate values for CL_PARA
On 08/30/11 15:52:12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Please send a patch. [... on points 1, 2, and 3]0
OK, will do.
> GF: Also, the use of fixed masks is problematic. Perhaps the AWK script
> GF: could be changed to also generate values for CL_PARAMS, etc., ensuring
> GF: that will not conflict with t
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
> 1) The sanity check should probably read:
>gcc_assert ((1U << cl_lang_count) <= CL_MIN_OPTION_CLASS);
> In other words, it is off-by-one.
Please send a patch.
> 2) The fixed shift counts starting at CL_PARAMS probably need to be
> adjusted upwards to
