On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 01/10/13 09:28, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
>>> on arm myself.
>>
>> It also fails on x86_64 with -
On 01/10/13 09:28, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
on arm myself.
It also fails on x86_64 with -m32. I always test on x86_64 with
multilibs enabled:
make -k -j12 check RUNTEST
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
> on arm myself.
It also fails on x86_64 with -m32. I always test on x86_64 with
multilibs enabled:
make -k -j12 check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/\{,-m32\}"
R
Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
on arm myself.
thanks,
David
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Richard, David,
>
>> In principle yes. Note that it changes the behavior of -O2
>> -ftree-vectorize
>> as -ftree-vectorize does not i
Hi Richard, David,
In principle yes. Note that it changes the behavior of -O2 -ftree-vectorize
as -ftree-vectorize does not imply changing the default cost model. I am
fine with that, but eventually this will have some testsuite fallout.
Indeed I am observing a regression with this patch on ar
Please review the changes.html change and suggest better wordings if possible:
ndex: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 changes.html
--- htd
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> I took the liberty to pick up Richard's original fvect-cost-model
>> patch and made some modification.
>>
>> What has not changed:
>> 1) option -ftree-vect-loop-version is removed
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> I took the liberty to pick up Richard's original fvect-cost-model
> patch and made some modification.
>
> What has not changed:
> 1) option -ftree-vect-loop-version is removed;
> 2) three cost models are introduced: cheap, dynamic, and un
