Re: cost model patch

[Kyrill Tkachov]

Hi Richard, David,
In principle yes.  Note that it changes the behavior of -O2 -ftree-vectorize
as -ftree-vectorize does not imply changing the default cost model.  I am
fine with that, but eventually this will have some testsuite fallout.
Indeed I am observing a regression with this patch on arm-none-eabi in
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c.
Seems that the cheap vectoriser model doesn't do unaligned stores (as expected I 
think?). Is adding -fvect-cost-model=dynamic to the test options the correct 
approach?


Thanks,
Kyrill