On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> darwin-driver.c had some code that depended on one of the include files, bit
> no other part of the file needed it, so that was the issue there. The only
> other place it seems could be an issue is with collect2.c... so I'll monitor
> th
On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 07:15 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Bernd Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm guessing it's the CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE macro which is used
>>> by darwin targets. It's also used for several other targets, so y
On 10/23/2015 01:24 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/23/2015 07:15 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Bernd Schmidt
wrote:
I'm guessing it's the CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE macro which is used
by darwin targets. It's also used for several other targets, so you
may want to double c
On 10/23/2015 07:15 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Bernd Schmidt
wrote:
I'm guessing it's the CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE macro which is used
by darwin targets. It's also used for several other targets, so you
may want to double check those.
No, only darwin is special, as p
On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> I'm guessing it's the CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE macro which is used by darwin
> targets. It's also used for several other targets, so you may want to double
> check those.
No, only darwin is special, as presently only darwin has the requisi
On 10/19/2015 05:53 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
interesting that none of the cross builds need diagnostics-core.h. I see
it used in 7 different targets. Must be something on the native build
command line that is defined which causes it to be needed.
I'm guessing it's the CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTUR
On 10/18/2015 05:31 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 16 Oct 2015, at 20:49, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/12/2015 04:04 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/08/2015 07:37 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/07/2015 06:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
I'm slightly concerned about the darwin, windows and solaris bi
Hi Andrew,
On 16 Oct 2015, at 20:49, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 04:04 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/08/2015 07:37 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2015 06:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> I'm slightly concerned about the darwin, windows and solaris bits. The
>> former primarily bec
On 10/16/2015 03:49 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/12/2015 04:04 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/08/2015 07:37 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/07/2015 06:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
I'm slightly concerned about the darwin, windows and solaris bits.
The former primarily because Darwin has been a gener
