On 08/11/2012 04:20 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
>> * reload1.c (replaced_subreg): New static function.
>> (gen_reload): Use it when deciding whether to use secondary
>> memory.
>
> This causes the following on hppa*-*-* (32-bit):
>
> ../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c: In function 'rtx_def*
> * reload1.c (replaced_subreg): New static function.
> (gen_reload): Use it when deciding whether to use secondary
> memory.
This causes the following on hppa*-*-* (32-bit):
../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c: In function 'rtx_def* gen_reload(rtx, rtx, int, reload_
type)':
../../gcc/gcc/r
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>>> Bootstrapped and tested on i686-linux. It's also been in several of our
>>> internal trees, going back to even 4.4-based ones IIRC, and has had
>>> testing for several architectures.
On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on i686-linux. It's also been in several of our
>> internal trees, going back to even 4.4-based ones IIRC, and has had
>> testing for several architectures. Ok for the i386 part? I intend to
>> check the reload bits i
Hello!
> Bootstrapped and tested on i686-linux. It's also been in several of our
> internal trees, going back to even 4.4-based ones IIRC, and has had
> testing for several architectures. Ok for the i386 part? I intend to
> check the reload bits in soon if there are no objections.
Index: gcc/conf
