On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> + /* expN(logN(x)) -> x. */
>> + (simplify
>> + (exps (logs @0))
>> + @0))
>
>
> We are not very consistent about it, but wasn't there an idea that we should
> use non_lvalue in most su
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Richard Sandiford wrote:
+ /* expN(logN(x)) -> x. */
+ (simplify
+ (exps (logs @0))
+ @0))
We are not very consistent about it, but wasn't there an idea that we
should use non_lvalue in most such places?
--
Marc Glisse
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi.
> OK to install?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> gcc/
> * builtins.c (fold_builtin_exponent): Delete.
> (fold_builtin_2): Handle const
