Re: Move expN folds to match.pd

[Marc Glisse]

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Richard Sandiford wrote:

+  /* expN(logN(x)) -> x.  */
+  (simplify
+   (exps (logs @0))
+   @0))

We are not very consistent about it, but wasn't there an idea that we 
should use non_lvalue in most such places?

--
Marc Glisse