On 19 November 2017 at 11:01, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 08:53 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> this patch makes static profile to be in range 0...2^30 rather than
>> 0...1. This is safe now as profile-counts are taking care of
>> possible overflow when the profile ends up cummula
On 11/17/2017 08:53 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch makes static profile to be in range 0...2^30 rather than
0...1. This is safe now as profile-counts are taking care of
possible overflow when the profile ends up cummulating too high after
inlining.
MThere are two testcases that needs
