On 19 November 2017 at 11:01, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote: > On 11/17/2017 08:53 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> >> Hi, >> this patch makes static profile to be in range 0...2^30 rather than >> 0...10000. This is safe now as profile-counts are taking care of >> possible overflow when the profile ends up cummulating too high after >> inlining. >> MThere are two testcases that needs adusting. dump-2.c simply checks >> for specific value of counter that is now different. pr77445-2 >> now gets one extra mismatch reported. The mismatch was present before >> too but due to low precision it was not visible. >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted. >> >> Honza >> >> * predict.c (determine_unlikely_bbs): Set cgraph node count to 0 >> when entry block was promoted unlikely. >> (estimate_bb_frequencies): Increase frequency scale. >> * profile-count.h (profile_count): Export precision info. >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/dump-2.c: Fixup template for profile precision >> changes. >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c: Fixup template for profile >> precision >> changes. > > > Hi, > > this caused PR 83043 - "FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c > scan-tree-dump-times graphite "2 loops carried no dependency" 1 (found 0 > times)" ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043 ). >
I have also reported PR 83081 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 FAIL: gcc.dg/pr80218.c scan-rtl-dump-not ira "Invalid sum" on arm-none-linux-gnueabi This might be a duplicate. Christophe > Thanks, > - Tom
