On 13/06/17 21:51 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 12/05/2017 13:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
A much simpler (but equivalent) change would be:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/tree.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/tree.cc
@@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
/* Static keyword was miss
On 12/05/2017 13:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
A much simpler (but equivalent) change would be:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/tree.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/tree.cc
@@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
/* Static keyword was missing on _Rb_tree_rotate_left.
Export the sym
On 12/05/2017 13:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11/05/17 22:06 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
When versioned namespace is active we can avoid export of
_Rb_tree_rotate_[left,right] symbols. I also took the opportunity to
put static functions in the anonymous namespace rather than using
s
On 11/05/17 22:06 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
When versioned namespace is active we can avoid export of
_Rb_tree_rotate_[left,right] symbols. I also took the opportunity to
put static functions in the anonymous namespace rather than using
static. Is this usage of static still planned
