On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hmm, this is not good since 319433-020.pdf and 319433-022.pdf redirect
>> to 319433-028 (which is the same as under the new URL I now used). And
>> the links to 319433-015.pdf and 319433-023.pdf both were broken.
>>
>> Do you have a recommendation?
> I
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:02:38PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> One old link in svn.html contained "319433-020" in its file name, the
> >> new one I found shows "319433-028" on the title page, so I assume this
> >> is a newer version of the same?
> >
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> One old link in svn.html contained "319433-020" in its file name, the
>> new one I found shows "319433-028" on the title page, so I assume this
>> is a newer version of the same?
> Unfortunately not. In -025 they've removed most of the instructions
> fr
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:44:30PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Intel's webmasters were at it again (or rather not).
>
> One old link in svn.html contained "319433-020" in its file name, the
> new one I found shows "319433-028" on the title page, so I assume this
> is a newer version of the sam
