> On Apr 16, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to
> start this removal?
No, the home page says:
Status: 2016-03-10 (regression fixes & docs only).
for gcc 7 (aka trunk). Technically, that should update to say all fixes,
_b
On 16/04/16 21:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes
>>> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping
>>> this (short of historic reasons)?
>> I guess the next news will
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes
>> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping
>> this (short of historic reasons)?
> I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the
> GCC 7 devel
- Original Message -
> It turns out the stricter server settings also broke the /java
> page on gcc.gnu.org.
>
> This restores showing two columns on this page (though it still
> uses non-standard CSS extensions).
>
>
> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all change
