On 16/04/16 21:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote: >>> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes >>> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping >>> this (short of historic reasons)? >> I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the >> GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should >> be limited anyway. > > Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to > start this removal?
Sounds good. OTOH, I don't think there's any great hurry. > Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove > https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now? > > ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.) It's so old that I don't think it's of any use. However, I wonder if it might make more sense to at least have a page saying that GCJ is gone. Andrew.
