On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> + reload_completed = 1;
>> + epilogue_completed = 1;
>>
>> Do we really need these? Perhaps a comment should be added here, it is
>> not obvious at the first sight...
>
> We didn't need these. ia64 did because there we run a split p
On 07/10/2011 02:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> + reload_completed = 1;
> + epilogue_completed = 1;
>
> Do we really need these? Perhaps a comment should be added here, it is
> not obvious at the first sight...
We didn't need these. ia64 did because there we run a split pass
to properly generate
> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
> !deep branch prediction paths.
>
> Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
> but still better, is to always emit rtl, and support that in
> the
On 07/10/2011 02:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
>> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
>> !deep branch prediction paths.
>>
>> Ideally, we'd do this g
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
> !deep branch prediction paths.
>
> Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
> but still
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 06:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
>>> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
>>> !
On 07/09/2011 06:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
>> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
>> !deep branch prediction paths.
>>
>> Ideally, we'd do this generi
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
> !deep branch prediction paths.
>
> Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
> but still
