On 09/30/13 14:11, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Oh, I can do that right now if you want - let me know if you haven't
hit the trigger yet. Thanks,
Already done :-0
jeff
Nevermind - see that you did this already. Thanks!
Teresa
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Oh, I can do that right now if you want - let me know if you haven't
> hit the trigger yet. Thanks,
> Teresa
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 09/30/13 13:0
Oh, I can do that right now if you want - let me know if you haven't
hit the trigger yet. Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/30/13 13:07, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 09/30/13 12:52, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> The jump threading handling in the case of a joiner
On 09/30/13 13:07, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/30/13 12:52, Teresa Johnson wrote:
The jump threading handling in the case of a joiner block was not
updating
profile information (it was being updated in the non-joiner case). Added
profile updates for the joiner case, in one place by commoning the
handl
On 09/30/13 12:52, Teresa Johnson wrote:
The jump threading handling in the case of a joiner block was not updating
profile information (it was being updated in the non-joiner case). Added
profile updates for the joiner case, in one place by commoning the
handling between the joiner and non-joine
