Nevermind - see that you did this already. Thanks! Teresa On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohn...@google.com> wrote: > Oh, I can do that right now if you want - let me know if you haven't > hit the trigger yet. Thanks, > Teresa > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 09/30/13 13:07, Jeff Law wrote: >>> >>> On 09/30/13 12:52, Teresa Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>> The jump threading handling in the case of a joiner block was not >>>> updating >>>> profile information (it was being updated in the non-joiner case). Added >>>> profile updates for the joiner case, in one place by commoning the >>>> handling between the joiner and non-joiner cases. >>>> >>>> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Teresa >>>> >>>> 2013-09-30 Teresa Johnson <tejohn...@google.com> >>>> >>>> * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (ssa_fix_duplicate_block_edges): >>>> Update redirected out edge count in joiner case. >>>> (ssa_redirect_edges): Common the joiner and non-joiner cases >>>> so that joiner case gets profile updates. >>>> >>>> * testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-3.c (expand_one_var): >>>> Update for additional dump message. >>> >>> Thanks for the fix & cleanup. OK for the trunk. >> >> BTW, I'm going to go ahead and check this in -- it's conflicts with a patch >> that I was trying to wrap up today... >> >> jeff >> > > > > -- > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohn...@google.com | 408-460-2413
-- Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohn...@google.com | 408-460-2413
