Evgeny Karpov writes:
> Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:40 PM
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the updates and sorry again for the slow review.
>> I've replied to some of the patches in the series but otherwise it looks
>> good to
>> me.
>>
>> If you agree with the suggested changes then
Evgeny Karpov writes:
> Hello,
>
> v2 is ready for the review!
> Based on the v1 review:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/thread.html#646203
>
> Testing for the x86_64-w64-mingw32 target is in progress to avoid
> regression due to refactoring.
Thanks for the updates and
/actions/runs/8349019387
>
> Best regards,
>
> Radek Bartoň
>
>
> From: Radek Barton
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 10:05 PM
> To: Evgeny Karpov; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: richard.sandif...@arm.com; Richard Earnshaw (lists); Andrew Pinski
> (QU
PATCH v2 00/13] Add aarch64-w64-mingw32 target
Hello, everyone.
Currently, we are able to provide results of regression testing for
`x86_64-w64-mingw32` target with `--enable-languages=c,lto,c++,fortran` running
in WSL only.
The summarized results, both for the branch with patch set applied an
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Fangrui Song wrote:
LLVM has had an aarch64 mingw ABI support for a long time. Does this
patch series introduce a different ABI?
If yes, do you have a summary?
This patchset in itself does not reach ABI compatibility with the
preexisting aarch64 mingw ecosystem - but this
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:59 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:10 PM Evgeny Karpov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Monday, March 18, 2024 2:34 PM
> > Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >
> > > I had a look at the v2 series, and besides a minor comment patch #8, ISTM
> > > than
> > > all the commen
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:10 PM Evgeny Karpov
wrote:
>
>
> Monday, March 18, 2024 2:34 PM
> Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > I had a look at the v2 series, and besides a minor comment patch #8, ISTM
> > than
> > all the comments your received about v1 have been addressed, indeed.
> >
> > > While unit
Hello, everyone.
Currently, we are able to provide results of regression testing for
`x86_64-w64-mingw32` target with `--enable-languages=c,lto,c++,fortran` running
in WSL only.
The summarized results, both for the branch with patch set applied and its
corresponding base branch, show:
517501
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 21:48, Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> Monday, March 4, 2024
> Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> >
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > Adjust the target name to aarch64-*-mingw* to exclude the big-endian target
> > from support.
> > Exclude 64-bit ISA.
> > Rename enum calling_abi to aarch64_calli
May I suggest you keep the mcf thread model for aarch-w64-mingw32? I requested Martin Storsjö to
test it on a physical Windows 11 on ARM machine with Clang and all tests passed. I think it should
work once the GCC support is complete.
--
Best regards,
LIU Hao
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descriptio
10 matches
Mail list logo
