On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 6:27 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 10:17 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > From: Andi Kleen
> >
> > Time vars normally use times(2) to get the user/sys/wall time, which is
> > always a
> > system call. I don't think the system time is very useful because
> So, shouldn't we go without the new option and simply change
> -ftime-report behavior?
I think it's fine (given the constraints I outlined earlier).
It will slightly change the output, but I guess there aren't that many
users that parse it mechanically.
I can do that unless someoneelse objects.
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 10:17 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> Time vars normally use times(2) to get the user/sys/wall time, which is
> always a
> system call. I don't think the system time is very useful because most
> overhead
> is in user time. If we only use the wall (or monoto
