Re: [PATCH] Fix a few incorrect accesses.

2022-12-07 Thread Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
On 12/7/22 05:08, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi Andrew! On 2022-12-02T09:12:23-0500, Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: This consists of 3 changes which stronger type checking has indicated are non-compliant with the type field. I'm curious what that "stronger type checking" is? Remnants

Re: [PATCH] Fix a few incorrect accesses.

2022-12-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Andrew! On 2022-12-02T09:12:23-0500, Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: > This consists of 3 changes which stronger type checking has indicated > are non-compliant with the type field. I'm curious what that "stronger type checking" is? Grüße Thomas > I doubt they are super important

Re: [PATCH] Fix a few incorrect accesses.

2022-12-02 Thread Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
On 12/2/22 09:52, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:13 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: This consists of 3 changes which stronger type checking has indicated are non-compliant with the type field. I doubt they are super important because there has not been a trap trigger

Re: [PATCH] Fix a few incorrect accesses.

2022-12-02 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:13 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: > > This consists of 3 changes which stronger type checking has indicated > are non-compliant with the type field. > > I doubt they are super important because there has not been a trap > triggered by them, and they have been in