Thanks, Jeff -- I caught it as soon as I hit the stupid button... :)
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 11:56 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2017 10:54 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644,
>> the test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c do
On 02/22/2017 10:54 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644,
the test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c does not apply to POWER
targets, as the cost model properly shows the pre-increment approach
to be preferable and results in ideal code
