Thanks, Jeff -- I caught it as soon as I hit the stupid button... :)
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 11:56 AM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2017 10:54 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644,
>> the test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c does not apply to POWER
>> targets, as the cost model properly shows the pre-increment approach
>> to be preferable and results in ideal code generation. Thus, adding
>> powerpc*-*-* to the list of targets to skip for this test.
>>
>> Verified on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Is this ok for trunk?
> ENOPATCH, but it's obvious what the patch should be, so OK.
>
> jeff
>
>
