On 4/15/25 11:44 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2025, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> I have verified the modified test case ICEs with the exact same
>> error as the original test case using the commit immediately
>> before the commit the fixed the ICE.
>
> Awesome, thanks! I hereby withdraw th
On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C
> -typedef __attribute__((altivec(vector__))) double co;
> +typedef double co __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
FWIW, I've tested this change on gcc-14 powerpc-elf and I confi
On Apr 15, 2025, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 4/14/25 11:30 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>
>>> This is an architecture independent test case, so I'm surprised this
>>> doesn't FAIL on non-powerpc targets since they don't know anything
>>> about altivec.
>>
On 4/14/25 11:30 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner wrote:
>
>> This is an architecture independent test case, so I'm surprised this
>> doesn't FAIL on non-powerpc targets since they don't know anything
>> about altivec.
>
> AFAICT we ignore attributes we don't know abou
On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This is an architecture independent test case, so I'm surprised this
> doesn't FAIL on non-powerpc targets since they don't know anything
> about altivec.
AFAICT we ignore attributes we don't know about.
I'd think the following fix should help them too.
On 4/11/25 12:57 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C
> index a8557522467d7..9ec5707eb4c4d 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr112822.C
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> /* PR tree-optimization/11282
