On Apr 15, 2025, Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On 4/14/25 11:30 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> This is an architecture independent test case, so I'm surprised this >>> doesn't FAIL on non-powerpc targets since they don't know anything >>> about altivec. >> >> AFAICT we ignore attributes we don't know about. >> >> I'd think the following fix should help them too. >> >> I considered doing something like that, but I don't know whether the >> modified test would trigger the original ICE. It seemed fragile, and >> the change could sort of invalidate the regression test.
> I have verified the modified test case ICEs with the exact same > error as the original test case using the commit immediately > before the commit the fixed the ICE. Awesome, thanks! I hereby withdraw the proposed patch, in favor of yours. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/ Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity. Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!
