Re: [PATCH][www] Document versioning scheme for GCC 5 and up

2014-08-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Apparently using numbers without dots in 4.9/5 Regression has the > disadvantage that some bugs make it to the query even when they should not, > like > [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_address_disp, at rtlanal.c:5537 > or > avx512f-ceil-sfix-vec-2.c

Re: [PATCH][www] Document versioning scheme for GCC 5 and up

2014-08-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! Apparently using numbers without dots in 4.9/5 Regression has the disadvantage that some bugs make it to the query even when they should not, like [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_address_disp, at rtlanal.c:5537 or avx512f-ceil-sfix-vec-2.c and avx512f-floor-sfix-vec-2.c FAIL on Solaris9/x86 Matchi

Re: [PATCH][www] Document versioning scheme for GCC 5 and up

2014-08-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:21:29PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > The release management team has aggreed to go forward with the > > change to bump the major with each further release. > > > > The following aims to document the details of the ver

Re: [PATCH][www] Document versioning scheme for GCC 5 and up

2014-08-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:21:29PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > The release management team has aggreed to go forward with the > change to bump the major with each further release. > > The following aims to document the details of the versioning scheme we > intend to use for GCC 5 and up. >