On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:21:29PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The release management team has aggreed to go forward with the
> change to bump the major with each further release.
>
> The following aims to document the details of the versioning scheme we
> intend to use for GCC 5 and up.
>
> Summary in non-html: Development of GCC 5 will happen as
> GCC 5.0.0 (experimental), once we enter regression-fixing-only mode
> (post-stage3) it will become GCC 5.0.1 (prerelease). The
> GCC 5 release itself will be numbered GCC 5.1.0 and development
> on the branch will continue as GCC 5.1.1 followed by a GCC 5.2.0
> release and GCC 5.2.1 branch development. Stage1 of GCC 6 will
> bump us to GCC 6.0.0.
>
> Ok for www?
Looks good to me, though, can you please add <a name="num_scheme">...</a>
to the title? Would like to refer to that from index.html.
Here is my current set of changes (note, I have changed bugzilla to use
[4.9/5 Regression] and similar subjects instead of
[4.9/4.10 Regression] and renamed 4.10.0 version and milestones.
Perhaps we should also change all 4.10.0 in Known to work and Known to fail
fields?
--- develop.html 16 Jul 2014 14:01:06 -0000 1.143
+++ develop.html 13 Aug 2014 12:40:48 -0000
@@ -502,6 +502,10 @@ stages of development, branch points, an
| v
| GCC 4.9.1 release (2014-07-16)
|
+ New GCC versioning scheme announced
+ |
+ GCC 5 Stage 1
+ |
v
</pre>
--- index.html 30 Jul 2014 17:57:07 -0000 1.933
+++ index.html 13 Aug 2014 12:40:48 -0000
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ mission statement</a>.</p>
<dl class="news">
+<dt><span>New GCC version numbering <a href="develop.html">scheme</a>
announced</span>
+ <span class="date">[2014-08-13]</span></dt>
+ <dd></dd>
+
<dt><span><a href="gcc-4.9/">GCC 4.9.1</a> released</span>
<span class="date">[2014-07-16]</span></dt>
<dd></dd>
@@ -165,17 +169,17 @@ Any additions? Don't be shy, send them
<a href="gcc-5/changes.html">changes</a>)
</dt><dd>
Status:
- <!--GCC 5.0 status below-->
+ <!--GCC 5 status below-->
<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-04/msg00090.html";>2014-04-11</a>
- <!--GCC 5.0 status above-->
+ <!--GCC 5 status above-->
(general development, stage 1).
<br />
<span class="regress">
<a
-
href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.10&target_milestone=4.8.4&target_milestone=4.9.2&target_milestone=4.10.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=";>Serious
+
href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=5&target_milestone=4.8.4&target_milestone=4.9.2&target_milestone=5.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=";>Serious
regressions</a>.
<a
-
href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.10&target_milestone=4.8.4&target_milestone=4.9.2&target_milestone=4.10.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=";>All
+
href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=5&target_milestone=4.8.4&target_milestone=4.9.2&target_milestone=5.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=";>All
regressions</a>.
</span>
</dd>
--- releasing.html 27 Jun 2014 18:53:31 -0000 1.45
+++ releasing.html 13 Aug 2014 12:40:48 -0000
@@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ also files such as <code>/some/where/gcc
<li>Upload the release to ftp.gnu.org.</li>
-<li>Increment the version number in <code>gcc/BASE-VER</code>. Restore
-the word "prerelease" (without the quotation marks) to
-<code>gcc/DEV-PHASE</code>. Check these files in.</li>
+<li>Increment the version number in <code>gcc/BASE-VER</code>.
+<code>gcc/DEV-PHASE</code> remains empty. Check the file in.</li>
<li>Notify developers that checkins to the branch are once again
allowed.</li>
Jakub
