On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Shouldn't CILK_FOR also be added to gcc/gimplify.c:is_gimple_stmt, next
> to all the other OMP_FOR variants?
>
> diff --git gcc/gimplify.c gcc/gimplify.c
> index 2319fc3..a621824 100644
> --- gcc/gimplify.c
> +++ gcc/gimplify.c
> @
Hi!
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:36:17 +, "Zamyatin, Igor"
wrote:
> The patch is another attempt to enable Cilk_for (see eg
> https://www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm)
> in the GCC compiler.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64.
> Is
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:36:17PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The patch is another attempt to enable Cilk_for (see eg
> https://www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm)
> in the GCC compiler.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64
