Here is what I have commited (svn 196876.): a few updates were necessary.
Christophe.
2013-03-21 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add
prefer_neon_for_64bits field.
* config/arm/arm.c (prefer_neon_for_64bits): New variable.
(
Here is a new version of my patch, with the cleanup you requested.
2012-12-18 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add
prefer_neon_for_64bits field.
* config/arm/arm.c (prefer_neon_for_64bits): New variable.
(arm_slowmu
Ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01197.html
On 16 January 2013 14:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Ping^2 ?
>
>
> On 8 January 2013 17:24, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Ping?
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01197.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>> On 19 December
Ping^2 ?
On 8 January 2013 17:24, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Ping?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01197.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
>
> On 19 December 2012 16:59, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 17 December 2012 16:12, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> On 29/11/12 17:16, Christophe Ly
Ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01197.html
Thanks,
Christophe
On 19 December 2012 16:59, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 17 December 2012 16:12, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 29/11/12 17:16, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> On trunk I have noticed a regression in gfortran when using m
On 17 December 2012 16:12, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 29/11/12 17:16, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On trunk I have noticed a regression in gfortran when using modulo
>> scheduling: sms-1.f90 now fails, but I suspect it's not because of
>> this patch since forcing compilation for armv5t makes the sa
On 29/11/12 17:16, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on a patch to avoid using Neon for 64 bits bitops
when it's too expensive to move data between core and Neon registers.
Benchmarking and validation look OK on the 4.7 branch (compiler
configured for thumb and hard FP)
- validatio
Ping^2?
On 7 December 2012 09:34, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Ping?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg02558.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe.
Ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg02558.html
Thanks,
Christophe.
On 30 November 2012 17:34, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 29 November 2012 21:59, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>>> 2012-11-28 Christophe Lyon
>>>
>>> gcc/
>>> *
On 29 November 2012 21:59, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
>> 2012-11-28 Christophe Lyon
>>
>> gcc/
>> * config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add
>> prefer_neon_for_64bits field.
>> * config/arm/arm.c (prefer_neon_for_64bits): New variabl
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> 2012-11-28 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/
> * config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add
> prefer_neon_for_64bits field.
> * config/arm/arm.c (prefer_neon_for_64bits): New variable.
> (arm_slowmul_tune): Default prefer_neon_for_64bits
11 matches
Mail list logo