On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Christophe Lyon wrote:

> 2012-11-28  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
> 
>     gcc/
>     * config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add
>     prefer_neon_for_64bits field.
>     * config/arm/arm.c (prefer_neon_for_64bits): New variable.
>     (arm_slowmul_tune): Default prefer_neon_for_64bits to false.
>     (arm_fastmul_tune, arm_strongarm_tune, arm_xscale_tune): Ditto.
>     (arm_9e_tune, arm_v6t2_tune, arm_cortex_tune): Ditto.
>     (arm_cortex_a5_tune, arm_cortex_a15_tune): Ditto.
>     (arm_cortex_a9_tune, arm_fa726te_tune): Ditto.
>     (arm_option_override): Handle -mneon-for-64bits new option.
>     * config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_PREFER_NEON_64BITS): New macro.
>     (prefer_neon_for_64bits): Declare new variable.
>     * config/arm/arm.md (arch): Rename neon_onlya8 and neon_nota8 to
>     avoid_neon_for_64bits and neon_for_64bits.
>     (arch_enabled): Handle new arch types.
>     (one_cmpldi2): Use new arch names.
>     * config/arm/neon.md (adddi3_neon, subdi3_neon, iordi3_neon)
>     (anddi3_neon, xordi3_neon, ashldi3_neon, <shift>di3_neon): Use
>     neon_for_64bits instead of nota8 and avoid_neon_for_64bits instead
>     of onlya8.

This ChangeLog entry doesn't appear to mention the arm.opt change.  
Furthermore, the patch seems to be missing any .texi change to document 
the option; any new option needs documentation.  You are also missing 
testcases for the testsuite to verify that both enabled and disabled 
states of the option work properly.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Reply via email to