RE: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Split VF iterators for Zvfh(min).

, June 22, 2023 9:37 PM To: rdapp.gcc ; gcc-patches ; palmer ; kito.cheng ; Li, Pan2 ; Jeff Law Cc: rdapp.gcc Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Split VF iterators for Zvfh(min). Oh. I see. I think I am wrong. Sorry for that :). load/store are using 'V' iterators. This patch looks reason

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Split VF iterators for Zvfh(min).

Oh. I see. I think I am wrong. Sorry for that :). load/store are using 'V' iterators. This patch looks reasonable to me now. Thanks for catching this. juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Robin Dapp Date: 2023-06-22 21:32 To: 钟居哲; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng; pan2.li; Jeff Law CC: rdapp.gcc Subje

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Split VF iterators for Zvfh(min).

I don't understand why it is necessary to bother "VF". "VF” should not be changed since intrinsic stuff is quite stable and any unreasonable changes are unacceptable. >> What are the many instructions that are valid in TARGET_ZVFHMIN? vle/vse/vluxei/vloxei/vsuxei/vsoxei/vlse/vsse. juzhe.zh...@