Re: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8

2020-09-16 Thread Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches
Thanks Christophe for reporting the errors. On 9/16/20, 7:45 AM, "Kyrylo Tkachov" wrote: > > The new tests vld1x3 and vld1x4 fail on arm, I am seeing new failures > > on gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches > > after r8-10451, r8-10452 and r9-8874. > > Is that expected/fixed later in the backport series? > >

RE: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8

2020-09-16 Thread Kyrylo Tkachov
> -Original Message- > From: Christophe Lyon > Sent: 16 September 2020 13:43 > To: Pop, Sebastian > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8 > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:21, Pop, Sebastian

Re: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8

2020-09-16 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:21, Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Thanks Kyrill for your review. > > I committed the patches to the gcc-8 branch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c55e6caa9432b2c1f081cb3aeddd36abec03233 > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a4004

Re: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8

2020-09-15 Thread Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches
Thanks Kyrill for your review. I committed the patches to the gcc-8 branch: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c55e6caa9432b2c1f081cb3aeddd36abec03233 https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a4004f62d60ada3a20dbf30146ca461047a575cc and to the gcc-9 branch: https://gcc.gnu.or

RE: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8

2020-09-15 Thread Kyrylo Tkachov
Hi Sebastian, This patch implements missing intrinsics. I'm okay with this being applied to the GCC 8 branch as these intrinsics have been defined in ACLE for a long time. It is arguably a bug that they've been missing from GCC8. Their implementation is fairly self-contained we haven't had any bu