On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:21, Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Thanks Kyrill for your review. > > I committed the patches to the gcc-8 branch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c55e6caa9432b2c1f081cb3aeddd36abec03233 > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a4004f62d60ada3a20dbf30146ca461047a575cc > > and to the gcc-9 branch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=c5aca0333b723d5e20366593cd01047d105f54e4 > > Sebastian >
Hi Sebastian, The new tests vld1x3 and vld1x4 fail on arm, I am seeing new failures on gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches after r8-10451, r8-10452 and r9-8874. Is that expected/fixed later in the backport series? (on the release branches, my validations are running for every commit) Thanks, Christophe > On 9/15/20, 7:46 AM, "Kyrylo Tkachov" <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > This patch implements missing intrinsics. > I'm okay with this being applied to the GCC 8 branch as these intrinsics > have been defined in ACLE for a long time. > It is arguably a bug that they've been missing from GCC8. > Their implementation is fairly self-contained we haven't had any bugs > reported against these in my recollection. > > So ok on the grounds that it's a bug-fix. > Thanks, > Kyrill > > From: Pop, Sebastian <s...@amazon.com> > Sent: 11 September 2020 20:54 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> > Subject: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8 > > Hi, > > gcc-8 branch is missing NEON intrinsics for loads and stores. > Attached patches pass bootstrap and regression testing on Graviton2 > aarch64-linux. > > Ok to commit to gcc-8 branch? > > Thanks, > Sebastian >
